
                       GCC Frequently Asked Questions
                                      
   The latest version of this document is always available at
   [1]http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html.
   
   This FAQ tries to answer specific questions concerning GCC. For
   general information regarding C, C++, resp. Fortran please check the
   [2]comp.lang.c FAQ, [3]comp.lang.c++ FAQ, [4]comp.std.c++ FAQ, and the
   [5]Fortran Information page.
   
   Other GCC-related FAQs: [6]libstdc++-v3, and [7]GCJ.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                                   Questions
                                       
    1. [8]General information
         1. [9]What is the relationship between GCC and EGCS?
         2. [10]What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red
            Hat?
         3. [11]What is an open development model?
         4. [12]How do I report a bug?
         5. [13]How do I get a bug fixed or a feature added?
         6. [14]How can I get a development environment for GCC without
            using CVS?
    2. [15]Installation
         1. [16]Problems building the Fortran compiler
         2. [17]How to install multiple versions of GCC
         3. [18]Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries
         4. [19]libstdc++/libio tests fail badly with --enable-shared
         5. [20]GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld
         6. [21]cpp: Usage:... Error
         7. [22]Optimizing the compiler itself
    3. [23]Testsuite problems
         1. [24]Unable to run the testsuite
         2. [25]How do I pass flags like -fnew-abi to the testsuite?
         3. [26]How can I run the test suite with multiple options?
    4. [27]Bugs and Non-Bugs
         1. [28]Why can't I initialize a static variable with stdin?
         2. [29]Why can't I use #if here?
         3. [30]Problems with floating point computations
    5. [31]Older versions of GCC or EGCS
       
    1. [32]Why is there no testsuite in GCC 2.95?
    2. [33]Is there a stringstream / sstream for gcc 2.95.2?
       
     [34]Miscellaneous
    1. [35]Virtual memory exhausted
    2. [36]Friend Templates
    3. [37]Why do I need autoconf, bison, xgettext, automake, etc?
    4. [38]Problems debugging GCC code
    5. [39]Using GCC with GNAT/Ada
    6. [40]Why can't I build a shared library?
    7. [41]How to work around too long C++ symbol names? (-fsquangle)
    8. [42]When building C++, the linker says my constructors,
       destructors or virtual tables are undefined, but I defined them
    9. [43]What is libstdc++-v3 and how can I use it with g++?
   10. [44]Will GCC someday include an incremental linker?
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                              General information
                                       
What is the relationship between GCC and EGCS?

   In 1990/1991 gcc version 1 had reached a point of stability. For the
   targets it could support, it worked well. It had limitations inherent
   in its design that would be difficult to resolve, so a major effort
   was made to resolve those limitiations and gcc version 2 was the
   result.
   
   When we had gcc2 in a useful state, development efforts on gcc1
   stopped and we all concentrated on making gcc2 better than gcc1 could
   ever be. This is the kind of step forward we wanted to make with the
   EGCS project when it was formed in 1997.
   
   In April 1999 the Free Software Foundation officially halted
   development on the gcc2 compiler and appointed the EGCS project as the
   official GCC maintainers. The net result was a single project which
   carries forward GCC development under the ultimate control of the
   [45]GCC Steering Committee.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
What is the relationship between GCC and Cygnus / Red Hat?

   It is a common mis-conception that Red Hat controls GCC either
   directly or indirectly.
   
   While Red Hat does donate hardware, network connections, code and
   developer time to GCC development, Red Hat does not control GCC.
   
   Overall control of GCC is in the hands of the [46]GCC Steering
   Committee which includes people from a variety of different
   organizations and backgrounds. The purpose of the steering committee
   is to make decisions in the best interest of GCC and to help ensure
   that no individual or company has control over the project.
   
   To summarize, Red Hat contributes to the GCC project, but does not
   exert a controlling influence over GCC.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
What is an open development model?

   We are using a bazaar style [47][1] approach to GCC development: we
   make snapshots publicly available to anyone who wants to try them; we
   welcome anyone to join the development mailing list. All of the
   discussions on the development mailing list are available via the web.
   We're going to be making releases with a much higher frequency than
   they have been made in the past.
   
   In addition to weekly snapshots of the GCC development sources, we
   have the sources readable from a CVS server by anyone. Furthermore we
   are using remote CVS to allow remote maintainers write access to the
   sources.
   
   There have been many potential GCC developers who were not able to
   participate in GCC development in the past. We want these people to
   help in any way they can; we ultimately want GCC to be the best
   compiler in the world.
   
   A compiler is a complicated piece of software, there will still be
   strong central maintainers who will reject patches, who will demand
   documentation of implementations, and who will keep the level of
   quality as high as it is today. Code that could use wider testing may
   be integrated--code that is simply ill-conceived won't be.
   
   GCC is not the first piece of software to use this open development
   process; FreeBSD, the Emacs lisp repository, and the Linux kernel are
   a few examples of the bazaar style of development.
   
   With GCC, we are adding new features and optimizations at a rate that
   has not been done since the creation of gcc2; these additions
   inevitably have a temporarily destabilizing effect. With the help of
   developers working together with this bazaar style development, the
   resulting stability and quality levels will be better than we've had
   before.
   
     [1] We've been discussing different development models a lot over
     the past few months. The paper which started all of this introduced
     two terms: A cathedral development model versus a bazaar
     development model. The paper is written by Eric S. Raymond, it is
     called ``[48]The Cathedral and the Bazaar''. The paper is a useful
     starting point for discussions.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How do I report a bug?

   There are complete instructions [49]here.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How do I get a bug fixed or a feature added?

   There are lots of ways to get something fixed. The list below may be
   incomplete, but it covers many of the common cases. These are listed
   roughly in order of increasing difficulty for the average GCC user,
   meaning someone who is not skilled in the internals of GCC, and where
   difficulty is measured in terms of the time required to fix the bug.
   No alternative is better than any other; each has its benefits and
   disadvantages.
     * Hire someone to fix it for you. There are various companies and
       individuals providing support for GCC. This alternative costs
       money, but is relatively likely to get results.
     * Report the problem to gcc-bugs and hope that someone will be kind
       enough to fix it for you. While this is certainly possible, and
       often happens, there is no guarantee that it will. You should not
       expect the same response from gcc-bugs that you would see from a
       commercial support organization since the people who read
       gcc-bugs, if they choose to help you, will be volunteering their
       time. This alternative will work best if you follow the directions
       on [50]submitting bugreports.
     * Fix it yourself. This alternative will probably bring results, if
       you work hard enough, but will probably take a lot of time, and,
       depending on the quality of your work and the perceived benefits
       of your changes, your code may or may not ever make it into an
       official release of GCC.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How can I get a development environment for GCC without using CVS?

   GCC snapshots are available from the FTP server and its mirrors; see
   the [51]GCC mirror list.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                                 Installation
                                       
Problems building the Fortran compiler

   The Fortran front end can not be built with most vendor compilers; it
   must be built with GCC. As a result, you may get an error if you do
   not follow the install instructions carefully.
   
   In particular, instead of using "make" to build GCC, you should use
   "make bootstrap" if you are building a native compiler or "make cross"
   if you are building a cross compiler.
   
   It has also been reported that the Fortran compiler can not be built
   on Red Hat 4.X GNU/Linux for the Alpha. Fixing this may require
   upgrading binutils or to Red Hat 5.0; we'll provide more information
   as it becomes available.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How to install multiple versions of GCC

   It may be desirable to install multiple versions of the compiler on
   the same system. This can be done by using different prefix paths at
   configure time and a few symlinks.
   
   Basically, configure the two compilers with different --prefix
   options, then build and install each compiler. Assume you want "gcc"
   to be the latest compiler and available in /usr/local/bin; also assume
   that you want "gcc2" to be the older gcc2 compiler and also available
   in /usr/local/bin.
   
   The easiest way to do this is to configure the new GCC with
   --prefix=/usr/local/gcc and the older gcc2 with
   --prefix=/usr/local/gcc2. Build and install both compilers. Then make
   a symlink from /usr/local/bin/gcc to /usr/local/gcc/bin/gcc and from
   /usr/local/bin/gcc2 to /usr/local/gcc2/bin/gcc. Create similar links
   for the "g++", "c++" and "g77" compiler drivers.
   
   An alternative to using symlinks is to configure with a
   --program-transform-name option. This option specifies a sed command
   to process installed program names with. Using it you can, for
   instance, have all the new GCC programs installed as "new-gcc" and the
   like. You will still have to specify different --prefix options for
   new GCC and old GCC, because it is only the executable program names
   that are transformed. The difference is that you (as administrator) do
   not have to set up symlinks, but must specify additional directories
   in your (as a user) PATH. A complication with --program-transform-name
   is that the sed command invariably contains characters significant to
   the shell, and these have to be escaped correctly, also it is not
   possible to use "^" or "$" in the command. Here is the option to
   prefix "new-" to the new GCC installed programs
   "--program-transform-name='s,\\\\(.*\\\\),new-\\\\1,'". With the above
   --prefix option, that will install the new GCC programs into
   /usr/local/gcc/bin with names prefixed by "new-". You can use
   --program-transform-name if you have multiple versions of GCC, and
   wish to be sure about which version you are invoking.
   
   If you use --prefix, GCC may have difficulty locating a GNU assembler
   or linker on your system, [52]GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld explains
   how to deal with this.
   
   Another option that may be easier is to use the --program-prefix= or
   --program-suffix= options to configure. So if you're installing GCC
   2.95.2 and don't want to disturb the current version of GCC in
   /usr/local/bin/, you could do 'configure --program-suffix=-2.95.2 '.
   This should result in GCC being installed as /usr/local/bin/gcc-2.95.2
   instead of /usr/local/bin/gcc.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Dynamic linker is unable to find GCC libraries

   This problem manifests itself by programs not finding shared libraries
   they depend on when the programs are started. Note this problem often
   manifests itself with failures in the libio/libstdc++ tests after
   configuring with --enable-shared and building GCC.
   
   GCC does not specify a runpath so that the dynamic linker can find
   dynamic libraries at runtime.
   
   The short explanation is that if you always pass a -R option to the
   linker, then your programs become dependent on directories which may
   be NFS mounted, and programs may hang unnecessarily when an NFS server
   goes down.
   
   The problem is not programs that do require the directories; those
   programs are going to hang no matter what you do. The problem is
   programs that do not require the directories.
   
   SunOS effectively always passed a -R option for every -L option; this
   was a bad idea, and so it was removed for Solaris. We should not
   recreate it.
   
   However, if you feel you really need such an option to be passed
   automatically to the linker, you may add it to the GCC specs file.
   This file can be found in the same directory that contains cc1 (run
   gcc -print-prog-name=cc1 to find it). You may add linker flags such as
   -R or -rpath, depending on platform and linker, to the *link or *lib
   specs.
   
   Another alternative is to install a wrapper script around gcc, g++ or
   ld that adds the appropriate directory to the environment variable
   LD_RUN_PATH or equivalent (again, it's platform-dependent).
   
   Yet another option, that works on a few platforms, is to hard-code the
   full pathname of the library into its soname. This can only be
   accomplished by modifying the appropriate .ml file within
   libstdc++/config (and also libg++/config, if you are building libg++),
   so that $(libdir)/ appears just before the library name in -soname or
   -h options.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
GCC can not find GNU as/GNU ld

   GCC searches the PATH for an assembler and a loader, but it only does
   so after searching a directory list hard-coded in the GCC executables.
   Since, on most platforms, the hard-coded list includes directories in
   which the system asembler and loader can be found, you may have to
   take one of the following actions to arrange that GCC uses the GNU
   versions of those programs.
   
   To ensure that GCC finds the GNU assembler (the GNU loader), which are
   required by [53]some configurations, you should configure these with
   the same --prefix option as you used for GCC. Then build & install GNU
   as (GNU ld) and proceed with building GCC.
   
   Another alternative is to create links to GNU as and ld in any of the
   directories printed by the command `gcc -print-search-dirs | grep
   '^programs:''. The link to `ld' should be named `real-ld' if `ld'
   already exists. If such links do not exist while you're compiling GCC,
   you may have to create them in the build directories too, within the
   gcc directory and in all the gcc/stage* subdirectories.
   
   GCC 2.95 allows you to specify the full pathname of the assembler and
   the linker to use. The configure flags are `--with-as=/path/to/as' and
   `--with-ld=/path/to/ld'. GCC will try to use these pathnames before
   looking for `as' or `(real-)ld' in the standard search dirs. If, at
   configure-time, the specified programs are found to be GNU utilities,
   `--with-gnu-as' and `--with-gnu-ld' need not be used; these flags will
   be auto-detected. One drawback of this option is that it won't allow
   you to override the search path for assembler and linker with
   command-line options -B/path/ if the specified filenames exist.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
cpp: Usage:... Error

   If you get an error like this when building GCC (particularly when
   building __mulsi3), then you likely have a problem with your
   environment variables.
  cpp: Usage: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-unknown-linux-gnulibc1/2.7.2.3/cpp
  [switches] input output

   First look for an explicit '.' in either LIBRARY_PATH or
   GCC_EXEC_PREFIX from your environment. If you do not find an explicit
   '.', look for an empty pathname in those variables. Note that ':' at
   either the start or end of these variables is an implicit '.' and will
   cause problems.
   
   Also note '::' in these paths will also cause similar problems.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Optimizing the compiler itself

   If you want to test a particular optimization option, it's useful to
   try bootstrapping the compiler with that option turned on. For
   example, to test the -fssa option, you could bootstrap like this:
make BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -fssa" bootstrap
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                              Testsuite problems
                                       
Unable to run the testsuite

   If you get a message about unable to find "standard.exp" when trying
   to run the GCC testsuites, then your dejagnu is too old to run the GCC
   tests. You will need to get a newer version of dejagnu from
   [54]http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/dejagnu.html.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How do I pass flags like -fnew-abi to the testsuite?

   If you invoke runtest directly, you can use the --tool_opts option,
   e.g:
  runtest --tool_opts "-fnew-abi -fno-honor-std" <other options>

   Or, if you use make check you can use the make variable RUNTESTFLAGS,
   e.g:
  make RUNTESTFLAGS="--tool_opts '-fnew-abi -fno-honor-std'" check-g++
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How can I run the test suite with multiple options?

   If you invoke runtest directly, you can use the --target_board option,
   e.g:
  runtest --target_board "unix{-fPIC,-fpic,}" <other options>

   Or, if you use make check you can use the make variable RUNTESTFLAGS,
   e.g:
  make RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board 'unix{-fPIC,-fpic,}'" check-gcc

   Either of these examples will run the tests three times. Once with
   -fPIC, once with -fpic, and once with no additional flags.
   
   This technique is particularly useful on multilibbed targets.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                               Bugs and Non-Bugs
                                       
   Unfortunately, improvements in tools that are widely used are sooner
   or later bound to break something. Sometimes, the code that breaks was
   wrong, and then that code should be fixed, even if it works for
   earlier versions of GCC or other compilers. The following problems
   with some releases of widely used packages have been identified:
   
   There is a separate [55]list of well-known bugs describing known
   deficiencies. Naturally we'd like that list to be of zero length.
   
   To report a bug, see [56]How to report bugs.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Why can't I initialize a static variable with stdin?

   This has nothing to do with GCC, but people ask us about it a lot.
   Code like this:
  #include <stdio.h>

  FILE *yyin = stdin;

   will not compile with GNU libc (Linux libc6), because stdin is not a
   constant. This was done deliberately, in order for there to be no
   limit on the number of open FILE objects. It is surprising for people
   used to traditional Unix C libraries, but it is permitted by the C
   standard.
   
   This construct commonly occurs in code generated by old versions of
   lex or yacc. We suggest you try regenerating the parser with a current
   version of flex or bison, respectively. In your own code, the
   appropriate fix is to move the initialization to the beginning of
   main.
   
   There is a common misconception that the GCC developers are
   responsible for GNU libc. These are in fact two entirely separate
   projects. The appropriate place to ask questions relating to GNU libc
   is [57]libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Why can't I use #if here?

   Let me guess... you wrote code that looks something like this:
  memcpy(dest, src,
#ifdef PLATFORM1
         12
#else
         24
#endif
        );

   and you got a whole pile of error messages:
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within macro arg
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within macro arg
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within macro arg
test.c: In function `foo':
test.c:6: undefined or invalid # directive
test.c:8: undefined or invalid # directive
test.c:9: parse error before `24'
test.c:10: undefined or invalid # directive
test.c:11: parse error before `#'

   The problem, simply put, is that GCC's preprocessor does not allow you
   to put #ifdef (or any other directive) inside the arguments of a
   macro. Your C library's string.h happens to define memcpy as a macro -
   this is perfectly legitimate. The code therefore will not compile.
   
   We have two good reasons for not allowing directives inside macro
   arguments. First, it is not portable. It is "undefined behavior"
   according to the C standard; that means different compilers will do
   different things with it. Some will give you errors. Some will dump
   core. Some will silently mangle your code - you could get the
   equivalent of
        memcpy(dest, src, 1224);

   from the above example. A very few might do what you expected it to.
   We therefore feel it is most useful for GCC to reject this construct
   immediately so that it is found and fixed.
   
   Second, it is extraordinarily difficult to implement the preprocessor
   such that it does what you would expect for every possible directive
   found inside a macro argument. The best example is perhaps
#define foo(arg) ... arg ...
foo(blah
#undef foo
blah)

   which is impossible to implement in portable C without leaking memory.
   Allowing only a subset of directives would be confusing.
   
   It is always possible to rewrite code which uses conditionals inside
   macros so that it doesn't. You could write the above example
#ifdef PLATFORM1
   memcpy(dest, src, 12);
#else
   memcpy(dest, src, 24);
#endif

   This is a bit more typing, but I personally think it's better style in
   addition to being more portable.
   
   In recent versions of glibc, printf is among the functions which are
   implemented as macros.
   
Problems with floating point computations

   In a number of cases, GCC appears to perform floating point
   computations incorrectly. For example, the program
#include <iostream>

int main() {

 double min = 0.0;
 double max = 0.5;
 double width = 0.01;
 std::cout <<  (int)(((max - min) / width) - 1) << std::endl;

}

   might print 50 on some systems and optimization levels, and 51 on
   others.
   
   The is the result of rounding: The computer cannot represent all real
   numbers exactly, so it has to use approximations. When computing with
   approximation, the computer needs to round to the nearest
   representable number.
   
   This is not a bug in the compiler, but an inherent limitation of the
   float and double types. Please study [58]this paper for more
   information.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                        Older versions of GCC and EGCS
                                       
Why is there no testsuite in GCC 2.95?

   The GCC testsuite is not included in the GCC 2.95 release due to the
   uncertain copyright status of some tests.
   
   The GCC team has reviewed the entire testsuite to find and remove any
   tests with uncertain copyright status, following guidelines from Prof.
   Eben Moglen. The testsuite is included in GCC 3.0 and subsequent
   releases. Only a few tests needed to be removed from the testsuite.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Is there a stringstream / sstream for gcc 2.95.2?

   Yes, it's at:
   [59]http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00700/sstream.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
                                 Miscellaneous
                                       
Virtual memory exhausted error

   This error means your system ran out of memory; this can happen for
   large files, particularly when optimizing. If you're getting this
   error you should consider trying to simplify your files or reducing
   the optimization level.
   
   Note that using -pedantic or -Wreturn-type can cause an explosion in
   the amount of memory needed for template-heavy C++ code, such as code
   that uses STL. Also note that -Wall includes -Wreturn-type, so if you
   use -Wall you will need to specify -Wno-return-type to turn it off.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Friend Templates

   In order to make a specialization of a template function a friend of a
   (possibly template) class, you must explicitly state that the friend
   function is a template, by appending angle brackets to its name, and
   this template function must have been declared already. Here's an
   example:
template <typename T> class foo {
  friend void bar(foo<T>);
}

   The above declaration declares a non-template function named bar, so
   it must be explicitly defined for each specialization of foo. A
   template definition of bar won't do, because it is unrelated with the
   non-template declaration above. So you'd have to end up writing:
void bar(foo<int>) { /* ... */ }
void bar(foo<void>) { /* ... */ }

   If you meant bar to be a template function, you should have
   forward-declared it as follows. Note that, since the template function
   declaration refers to the template class, the template class must be
   forward-declared too:
template <typename T>
class foo;

template <typename T>
void bar(foo<T>);

template <typename T>
class foo {
  friend void bar<>(foo<T>);
};

template <typename T>
void bar(foo<T>) { /* ... */ }

   In this case, the template argument list could be left empty, because
   it can be implicitly deduced from the function arguments, but the
   angle brackets must be present, otherwise the declaration will be
   taken as a non-template function. Furthermore, in some cases, you may
   have to explicitly specify the template arguments, to remove
   ambiguity.
   
   An error in the last public comment draft of the ANSI/ISO C++ Standard
   and the fact that previous releases of GCC would accept such friend
   declarations as template declarations has led people to believe that
   the forward declaration was not necessary, but, according to the final
   version of the Standard, it is.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Why do I need autoconf, bison, xgettext, automake, etc?

   If you're using diffs up dated from one snapshot to the next, or if
   you're using the CVS repository, you may need several additional
   programs to build GCC.
   
   These include, but are not necessarily limited to autoconf, automake,
   bison, and xgettext.
   
   This is necessary because neither diff nor cvs keep timestamps
   correct. This causes problems for generated files as "make" may think
   those generated files are out of date and try to regenerate them.
   
   An easy way to work around this problem is to use the gcc_update
   script in the contrib subdirectory of GCC, which handles this
   transparently without requiring installation of any additional tools.
   (Note: Up to and including GCC 2.95 this script was called egcs_update
   .)
   
   When building from diffs or CVS or if you modified some sources, you
   may also need to obtain development versions of some GNU tools, as the
   production versions do not necessarily handle all features needed to
   rebuild GCC.
   
   In general, the current versions of these tools from
   [60]ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/ will work. At present, Autoconf 2.50 is not
   supported, and you will need to use Autoconf 2.13; work is in progress
   to fix this problem. Also look at
   [61]ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/ for any special versions
   of packages.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Problems debugging GCC code

   On some systems GCC will produce dwarf debug records by default;
   however the gdb-4.16 release may not be able to read such debug
   records.
   
   You can either use the argument "-gstabs" instead of "-g" or pick up a
   copy of gdb-4.17 to work around the problem.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Using GCC with GNAT/Ada

   The GNU Ada front-end is not currently supported by GCC, but work is
   in progress to integrate GNU Ada into the GCC CVS repository and
   produce new releases based on current versions of GCC.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Why can't I build a shared library?

   When building a shared library you may get an error message from the
   linker like `assert pure-text failed:' or `DP relative code in file'.
   
   This kind of error occurs when you've failed to provide proper flags
   to gcc when linking the shared library.
   
   You can get this error even if all the .o files for the shared library
   were compiled with the proper PIC option. When building a shared
   library, gcc will compile additional code to be included in the
   library. That additional code must also be compiled with the proper
   PIC option.
   
   Adding the proper PIC option (-fpic or -fPIC) to the link line which
   creates the shared library will fix this problem on targets that
   support PIC in this manner. For example:
        gcc -c -fPIC myfile.c
        gcc -shared -o libmyfile.so -fPIC myfile.o
     _________________________________________________________________
   
How to work around too long C++ symbol names (-fsquangle)

   This question does not apply to GCC 3.0 or later versions, which have
   a new C++ ABI with much shorter mangled names.
   
   If the standard assembler of your platform can't cope with the large
   symbol names that the default g++ name mangling mechanism produces,
   your best bet is to use GNU as, from the GNU binutils package.
   
   Unfortunately, GNU as does not support all platforms supported by GCC,
   so you may have to use an experimental work-around: the -fsquangle
   option, that enables compression of symbol names.
   
   Note that this option is still under development, and subject to
   change. Since it modifies the name mangling mechanism, you'll need to
   build libstdc++ and any other C++ libraries with this option enabled.
   Furthermore, if this option changes its behavior in the future, you'll
   have to rebuild them all again. :-(
   
   This option can be enabled by default by initializing
   `flag_do_squangling' with `1' in `gcc/cp/decl2.c' (it is not
   initialized by default), then rebuilding GCC and any C++ libraries.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
When building C++, the linker says my constructors, destructors or virtual
tables are undefined, but I defined them

   The ISO C++ Standard specifies that all virtual methods of a class
   that are not pure-virtual must be defined, but does not require any
   diagnostic for violations of this rule [class.virtual]/8. Based on
   this assumption, GCC will only emit the implicitly defined
   constructors, the assignment operator, the destructor and the virtual
   table of a class in the translation unit that defines its first such
   non-inline method.
   
   Therefore, if you fail to define this particular method, the linker
   may complain about the lack of definitions for apparently unrelated
   symbols. Unfortunately, in order to improve this error message, it
   might be necessary to change the linker, and this can't always be
   done.
   
   The solution is to ensure that all virtual methods that are not pure
   are defined. Note that a destructor must be defined even if it is
   declared pure-virtual [class.dtor]/7.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
What is libstdc++-v3 and how can I use it with g++?

   From the [62]libstdc++-v3 FAQ: "The GNU Standard C++ Library v3, or
   libstdc++-2.9x, is an ongoing project to implement the ISO 14882
   Standard C++ library as described in chapters 17 through 27 and annex
   D."
   
   libstdc++-v3 is enabled by default in 3.x releases of GCC.
     _________________________________________________________________
   
Will GCC someday include an incremental linker?

   Incremental linking is part of the linker, not the compiler. As such,
   GCC doesn't have anything to do with incremental linking. Depending on
   what platform you use, it may be possible to tell GCC to use the
   platform's native linker (e.g., Solaris' ild(1)).

References

   1. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
   2. http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
   3. http://www.cerfnet.com/~mpcline/On-Line-C++-FAQs/
   4. http://reality.sgi.com/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html
   5. http://www.fortran.com/fortran/info.html
   6. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html
   7. http://gcc.gnu.org/java/faq.html
   8. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#general
   9. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gcc
  10. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#cygnus
  11. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#open-development
  12. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#bugreport
  13. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#support
  14. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#noncvs
  15. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#installation
  16. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#fortran
  17. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#multiple
  18. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath
  19. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rpath
  20. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
  21. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#environ
  22. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#optimizing
  23. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#testsuite
  24. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#dejagnu
  25. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#testoptions
  26. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#multipletests
  27. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#bugs
  28. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#stdin
  29. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#macarg
  30. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#rounding
  31. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#old
  32. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#2.95suite
  33. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#2.95sstream
  34. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#misc
  35. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#memexhausted
  36. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#friend
  37. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#generated_files
  38. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gdb
  39. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gnat
  40. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#picflag-needed
  41. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#squangle
  42. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#vtables
  43. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#libstdc++
  44. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#incremental
  45. http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
  46. http://gcc.gnu.org/steering.html
  47. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#cathedral-vs-bazaar
  48. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/
  49. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
  50. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
  51. http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html
  52. http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
  53. http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html
  54. http://www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu/dejagnu.html
  55. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#known
  56. http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
  57. mailto:libc-alpha@sources.redhat.com
  58. http://www.validgh.com/goldberg/paper.ps
  59. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2000-q2/msg00700/sstream
  60. ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/
  61. ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/
  62. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html
